# Compare localization tools

Shortlist TMS, CAT, developer, subtitling, speech, annotation, and evaluation tools using the requirements that matter in real work.

- [Translation management systems compared](https://admas.net/resources/tools/translation-management-systems/index.md): Compare 13 TMS platforms by the differences that change a shortlist: data boundary, developer flow, content coverage, review, quality, and exit.
- [Developer i18n frameworks compared](https://admas.net/resources/tools/developer-i18n-frameworks/index.md): Compare 15 application i18n frameworks and native platform systems by messages, extraction, type safety, request isolation, fallback, and catalog portability.
- [CAT, terminology & linguistic QA tools compared](https://admas.net/resources/tools/cat-terminology-qa-tools/index.md): Compare 13 CAT and linguistic-QA tools by production formats, memory and terminology, QA depth, context, automation, and interchange.
- [Subtitling & audiovisual localization tools compared](https://admas.net/resources/tools/subtitling-audiovisual-tools/index.md): Compare ten timed-text tools by authoring, timing and reading-speed QC, accessibility, collaboration, automation, and professional delivery formats.
- [Speech, annotation & evaluation tools compared](https://admas.net/resources/tools/speech-annotation-evaluation-tools/index.md): Compare 12 labeling and research tools by data boundary, modality, annotation schema, model assistance, quality workflow, integration, and export.