Localization

Localization quality assurance

Human and systematic checks for meaning, consistency, layout, locale behavior, and release risk.

The challenge

Language errors are only one class of localization failure. Truncation, wrong formats, broken variables, bidirectional text, and missing context can all reach production.

Our QA model combines linguistic judgment with product-level inspection. We define severity around user impact and release risk, so teams can fix what matters instead of drowning in undifferentiated comments.

Findings become reusable guidance, test cases, and upstream improvements—not a recurring spreadsheet of the same defects.

How we work

Evidence first. Decisions visible. Knowledge transferred.

We adapt the depth and sequence to your product stage, language scope, and internal team.

Phase 01

Set the quality bar

Define locale coverage, risk areas, severity, acceptance criteria, environments, and ownership.

Phase 02

Test language in product

Review meaning, consistency, layout, formats, variables, navigation, and script-specific behavior.

Phase 03

Close the loop

Triage defects, verify fixes, identify root causes, and feed preventive changes into the workflow.

Typical outputs

What your team can use.

  • Locale test plan and quality rubric
  • Prioritized defect report with evidence
  • Fix verification and release recommendation
  • Root-cause and prevention recommendations
Keep exploring
Bring us the brief

Make localization quality assurance move.

Tell us what you are building, which languages matter, and where progress is blocked.

Start the conversation