Dataset curation & management

Data quality & evaluation

Evidence about whether a multilingual dataset is representative, consistent, safe, and fit for its intended model task.

The challenge

Generic cleanliness metrics miss the failures that matter: missing communities, mislabeled language, translation artifacts, leakage, unsafe content, and task mismatch.

We audit datasets against their intended use and documented claims. Quantitative profiling is paired with targeted linguistic and human review.

The result explains both what is present and what the data cannot safely support.

How we work

Evidence first. Decisions visible. Knowledge transferred.

We adapt the depth and sequence to your product stage, language scope, and internal team.

Phase 01

Define fitness

Translate intended use into coverage, quality, safety, privacy, leakage, and documentation criteria.

Phase 02

Profile and inspect

Measure composition and anomalies, then review targeted samples with language and domain specialists.

Phase 03

Decide and remediate

Identify removal, relabeling, rebalancing, enrichment, documentation, and model-evaluation actions.

Typical outputs

What your team can use.

  • Dataset fitness and risk framework
  • Composition, anomaly, and duplication analysis
  • Multilingual human quality audit
  • Remediation plan and dataset card inputs
Keep exploring
Bring us the brief

Make data quality & evaluation move.

Tell us what you are building, which languages matter, and where progress is blocked.

Start the conversation